Skip to content
  • The Accidental Product Manager
  • About
  • The Accidental Product Manager Newsletter
  • Archives

The Accidental Product Manager

Home Of The Billion Dollar Product Manager Where You Too Can Learn To Be A Wildly Successful Product Manger

The Accidental Product Manager

Product Managers Want To Know: Was The Gap’s Logo Redesign A Bad Idea?

September 8, 2013February 21, 2011 by drjim
Turns Out That The Old Gap Logo Was Right, The New One Was Wrong
Turns Out That The Old Gap Logo Was Right, The New One Was Wrong

There’s an old saying that goes something like this: “There is no such thing as bad publicity – all publicity is good publicity”. Hmm, should product managers really believe this? A good case study may have just happened over at the Gap. They decided to redesign their logo, and it went over like a lead balloon. What can we product managers learn from their fiasco?

What The Gap Did (and Undid)

So the product managers over at the Gap decided that their old company logo was getting too, what else?, “old”. They wanted to freshen it up. They went out and had a new logo designed. Now in their defense, the new logo did keep the same color scheme as the previous logo, but it used a different font and basically looked very different.

When they unveiled their new logo, I’m not sure what they were expecting to have happen. However, what did happen was unmistakable – lots and lots of negative feedback showed up right off the bat. Not just negative comments being posted online, but folks going so far as to set up Twitter accounts to play the role of the new logo and people designing creative web sites so that they could show how much they disliked the new logo.

The product managers at Gap did what probably most of us would have done in this case: they tried to make the best of a bad situation. They used social media to reach out to the online angry masses and asked for their inputs. However, that didn’t quell the anger at the new logo and so just a mere four days after introducing it, the new logo got pulled and was replaced by the old, much more familiar logo.

What The Study Tells Us

Oops, looks like the product managers at the Gap screwed up. So what’s there for the rest of us to learn here? Rob Walker over at the New York Times observed all of this backlash going on and wondered if there might be an upside to it.

Specifically, there is that old saying that “…any publicity is good, even bad publicity…” Walker wondered if this might apply to the Gap’s logo fiasco. It turns out that Dr. Jonah Berger has been looking into this very question.

What the research has shown is that if a brand or product is very familiar before the negative publicity happened, then the negative publicity will hurt it. However, if the brand or product was not well known before the negative publicity happened, then (here’s the strange part) will actually help it – boost sales, boost awareness.

What The Impact Of Side Effects Are

As amazing as Dr. Berger’s findings are, there’s more! Dr. Berger and his research team have gone a step further and taken a look at a closely related, but not exactly the same, issue. The product manager question that they looked at was what happens if some part of a brand that has nothing to do with your product directly, but is in some way linked to it, receives negative publicity? What’s the impact?

Walker found some great examples when he pointed out that Michael Jackson’s album sales actually went up when he was having legal troubles. Similarly, sales of Sienfeld DVDs went up when one of the show’s stars Michael Richards got in trouble for things that he said during a show at a comedy club.

What all of this means for product managers is that yes indeed, negative publicity can be a good thing for your product. It turns out that the more indirect the negative publicity is, the bigger boost it may have for your product. When it comes to the Gap, their product managers may find that the logo incident may actually end up helping them sell more clothes!

What All Of This Means For You

The Gap’s decision to roll out a redesigned logo may have seemed like a good idea; however, it quickly met with strong negative feedback from the public. Is any kind of publicity, including negative publicity, good for a brand?

Studies have shown that negative publicity can help an unknown brand burst into the spotlight. However, it can harm a brand that is already well known. When the negativity is associated with something that is just remotely linked to the brand, then it turn out to be a positive because potential customers will link the event to the brand and will remember the brand more easily.

Although it would probably be a poor decision for a product manager to set out to generate bad publicity for his / her product, when this type of publicity occurs it may not be the end of the world. Depending on how closely the negative publicity is linked to your product, you may actually see an increase in sales due to it. Smart product managers learn to roll with events as they happen and try to make the most of even negative publicity.

– Dr. Jim Anderson
Blue Elephant Consulting –
Your Source For Real World Product Management Skills™

Question For You: Do you think the Gap’s logo redesign was just a publicity stunt, or did they really mean to change it?

Click here to get automatic updates when
The Accidental Product Manager Blog is updated.

P.S.: Free subscriptions to The Accidental Product Manager Newsletter are now available. It’s your product – it’s your career. Subscribe now: Click Here!

What We’ll Be Talking About Next Time

Take a look at your wrist – are you wearing a watch? These days a lot of us have foregone watches because now we have cell phones that seem to always know what time it is. However, there is another group of people who wouldn’t be caught dead without having a watch on. In fact, they insist on wearing very, very expensive watches. When you could run to the nearest drug store and get a perfectly good watch for $10, how the heck do product managers convince some people to pay 10,000x more for a watch?

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related posts:

  1. Product Logo Redesign Time For Product Mangers
  2. What Can The Great Scion Teach Product Managers?
  3. When Product Managers Fall Down: What’s Happened To Lexus?
Categories Product Tags bad publicity, crowd sourcing, Gap, logo, logo redesign, negative buzz, negative publicity, negative reaction, P.R. misstep, positive effect, quick retreat, the Gap, would not change its logo
Product Managers Want To Know: What Happened To The Microsoft Kin Phones?
Really Expensive Watches Need Product Managers Too

Archives

  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
© 2026 The Accidental Product Manager • Built with GeneratePress
 

Loading Comments...